David Walliams’ future as a decide on Britain’s Acquired Expertise is “very a lot up within the air”, a spokesman for the ITV present has mentioned, amid reviews he’s leaving the present after 10 years.
Walliams lately apologized for making “disrespectful feedback” about contestants whereas taping an episode of the present, following a Guardian report.
The Solar newspaper reported on its entrance web page on Friday that Walliams was to give up the present. However a BGT spokesman mentioned no remaining resolution had been made on the 2023 judging record.
“The judging panel for Britain’s Acquired Expertise 2023 can be introduced in the end,” the spokesperson mentioned. “It is nonetheless very a lot up within the air in the mean time if David will participate in subsequent 12 months’s present. Nonetheless, no resolution has been taken to date.”
Walliams sits on the present’s judging panel alongside Simon Cowell, Amanda Holden and Alesha Dixon.
His apology, made earlier this month, got here after the comic was recorded making derogatory remarks and sexually specific feedback about attendees auditioning for the present on the London Palladium in January 2020.
Based on a leaked transcript seen by The Guardian, Walliams referred to an older performer as a “trick” thrice when he was out of attain after a failed audition. Throughout the audition, the contestant engaged in gentle banter with the judges, during which he made a joke about Walliams.
The transcript additionally recorded different sexually specific feedback that have been made after a contestant bought off the stage.
In a press release, Walliams mentioned: “I want to apologize to the individuals I made disrespectful feedback about throughout breaks in filming for Britain’s Acquired Expertise in 2020. These have been non-public conversations and – like most conversations with pals – have been by no means meant to be shared. . Nonetheless, I’m sorry.”
The Guardian reported that attorneys for Walliams and Thames TV, the manufacturing firm behind Britain’s Acquired Expertise, argued that the feedback have been a part of a non-public dialog that was by no means supposed for broadcast.
In a press release, Thames TV mentioned: “Though it referred to a non-public dialog virtually three years in the past, the language used was inappropriate. Despite the fact that it was non-public, these concerned have been spoken to and reminded of their duties and the present’s expectations of future skilled conduct.”
Walliams’ feedback have been picked up by microphones used to seize the judges’ discussions.
In a press release, ITV mentioned: “We don’t settle for the language introduced in these allegations and have spoken to the producers of Britain’s Acquired Expertise. The obligation of care to all individuals in any of our applications is all the time of paramount significance and we now have protocols and pointers in place for all our manufacturing companions.”
The Guardian reported that Walliams’ feedback have been the one situations of derogatory remarks made about contestants in three episodes that have been reviewed.