The Prime Minister should sort out extreme taxpayer-guaranteed pensions – from scratch

With a life disaster, a crumbling NHS, and the widespread risk of strikes gripping the nation, the brand new prime minister has so much to do.

However Liz Truss should additionally cope with the rising downside of public sector pensions. The annual value of recent pension commitments made every year has spiraled uncontrolled, and the whole worth of previous pension commitments has now reached £2.6 trillion – greater than the “on stability sheet” public sector debt.

To set an instance for the remainder of the general public sector, Ms Truss ought to first sort out MPs’ pensions. MPs needs to be moved from outlined profit pensions – assured by taxpayers to inflation-linked pensions for all times – to outlined contribution pensions much like the non-public sector, with MPs having particular person pension financial savings. There may be pot, and no taxpayer assure.

Virtually all MPs now obtain an inflation-linked pension of 1/51 of their wage every year – much like NHS, lecturers and civil servants – payable from State Pension age.

How a lot are MPs’ new pension guarantees costing taxpayers every year? The MPs’ Pension Scheme accounts for 2021 present a authorities value to taxpayers of 12.9 per cent of wage, after contributions from 10.6 per cent of MPs. So their mixed bundle is price £95,800, which equates to an £84,000 wage and £10,800 pension.

However the accounts additionally present the true value to taxpayers, which should be accounted for in all non-public sector outlined profit pensions.

Shock, shock: the annual value to taxpayers will not be 12.9pc of wage, however 43pc. This implies the MP’s wage and pension is admittedly £120,000 – £84,000 wage and £36,000 pension – a lot, a lot larger than the official determine.

And the 2022 accounts will present a good larger value – round 55 per cent of wage – bringing the whole wage and pension to £130,000.

If MPs’ pensions look beneficiant, they’re fairly stingy in comparison with the pensions of members of the Scottish Parliament. The precise annual value to taxpayers for 2021 was 62 % of wage.

Most public sector pensions are “unfunded”, with pensions successfully paid for by annual taxation. However the MPs’ pension scheme is funded equally to non-public sector schemes, with property of £770m in March 2021, together with, surprisingly, £80m of junk bonds.

Towards these property, what are the liabilities? Is there a deficit? The newest official evaluation, in April 2020, exhibits a £26m surplus, however the scheme accounts present £1.016bn in liabilities in April 2021 – a £245m deficit, not a surplus.

To cowl this deficit of £245m over seven years — the typical payback interval for personal sector schemes — means taxpayers have spent an additional £35m a 12 months. The fee of this, plus the true annual value of the brand new pension commitments, may certainly result in riots?

The “official” annual value of all new public sector pension commitments, together with MPs, and whole liabilities, is pure Alice in Wonderland – designed to magically shrink the issue and hold taxpayers at midnight. Is.

It is actually handy for MPs, who proceed to obtain costly pensions with out the voters trying, not to mention objecting.

In 2013 Tory MP Harriet Baldwin, a former minister, argued that MPs ought to transfer from outlined profit to outlined contribution pensions. He’s spot on.

Outlined contribution pensions won’t solely scale back prices to taxpayers, and make them clearer, however may even forestall the intergenerational rip-off of shifting prices to be paid by our kids and grandchildren.

Dwelling in the actual world of outlined contribution pensions – not gold-plated pensions assured by the taxpayer – will assist MPs perceive their constituents’ pension issues, and assist reform different public sector pensions. .

If Ms Truss actually needs to be a radical, reformist Prime Minister she ought to waste no time checking out MPs’ pensions.

John Rolfe is an impartial pensions guide and has suggested the Parliamentary Work and Pensions Choose Committee.

About the author


Leave a Comment